Course Project Recommendation

This week, you will begin to synthesize the information you have gathered and the analysis you have conducted of your selected technology. In order to bring your ideas together and prepare for your final presentation, you will complete a recommendation analysis. The recommendation analysis should provide three to four concrete recommendations for how to best utilize your selected technology. As part of your analysis, include the following. Introduction: Explain your selected technology and provide contextual details concerning application and reach. Thesis: Offer an argument to synthesize your ideas and provide a foundation for your recommendations and analysis. Ethical Dilemmas: Identify and describe three to four ethical dilemmas posed by your selected technology. Include concrete examples and ethical theories to help detail your summary. Recommendations: Offer concrete recommendations to help mediate each of the described dilemmas. Remember to consider stakeholders and resources for providing solutions. Conclusion: Summarize your main arguments and provide avenues for further discussion. As part of this assignment, you must consult and site at least three high-quality, academic sources. These sources should be from reputable publications that can be found in the DeVry Library or industry publications. A successful assignment will be three to four pages in length; include a minimum of three academic sources; be composed using Microsoft Word and using 12-point Times New Roman; include a minimum of three sources; and be formatted and cite sources using the seventh edition of APA. Don't forget to submit your assignment for grading. Rubric LMA: GE.LAS432.JUL18LMA: GE.LAS432.JUL18CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Critical Thinking (26 Points)Critical Thinking26 to >23.0 ptsExcellentThe paper includes a strong, original central idea that provides a unified trajectory of inquiry and analysis that is sustained throughout.23 to >20.0 ptsCompetentThe paper includes a central ideas with few tangents and diversions that unifies the argument but lacks clarity or creativity.20 to >17.0 ptsFairThe paper attempts to form a cohesive idea, but lacks concrete focus and unification of key components.17 to >14.0 ptsPoorThe paper has no unifying central idea to link key components of the argument together.14 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.26 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.A.Critical ThinkingCapstone Assessment of Student Mastery of Critical Thinking skillsthreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone – Student Performance: Strong, original central idea that provides a unified trajectory of inquiry and analysis that is sustained throughout.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone – Student Performance: Central ideas with few tangents and diversions that unifies the argument but lacks clarity or creativity.2 ptsFair: Capstone – Student Performance: Attempts to form a cohesive idea, but lacks concrete focus and unification of key components.1 ptsPoor: Capstone – Student Performance: No unifying central idea to link key components of the argument together.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone – Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Communication (16 points)16 to >14.0 ptsExcellentThe paper clearly communicates central ideas through precise use of language, attention to audience, grammar and mechanics, and communication conventions and formats appropriate to the genre.14 to >12.0 ptsCompetentThe paper communicates central ideas by demonstrating proficient use of language, audience awareness, grammar and mechanics and communication conventions appropriate to the genre.12 to >10.0 ptsFairThe paper attempts to communicate central ideas, but needs more proficient use of language, stronger attention to audience, and a more precise utilization of communication conventions. Grammar and mechanics needs improvement.10 to >8.0 ptsPoorThe paper lacks a clear understanding of language usage, audience awareness, and communication competence. Grammar and mechanics inhibit understanding.8 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.16 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.B.CommunicationCapstone Assessment of Student Communication Skillsthreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone – Student Performance: Communicates central ideas through precise use of language, attention to audience, grammar and mechanics, and communication conventions and formats appropriate to the genre.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone – Student Performance: Communicates central ideas by demonstrating proficient use of language, audience awareness, grammar and mechanics and communication conventions appropriate to the genre.2 ptsLimited: Capstone – Student Performance: Attempts to communicate central ideas, but needs more proficient use of language, stronger attention to audience, and a more precise utilization of communication conventions. Grammar and mechanics needs improvement.1 ptsPoor: Capstone – Student Performance: Lacks a clear understanding of language usage, audience awareness, and communication competence. Grammar and mechanics inhibit understanding.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone – Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Information Literacy (21 Points)21 to >19.0 ptsExcellentThe paper demonstrates a strong development of central arguments through detailed examples and evidence of appropriate and resourceful academic research. Evidence is used to forward the argument and develop conclusions and recommendations.19 to >17.0 ptsCompetentThe paper uses key examples from mostly reputable sources to develop a central argument. Evidence could be utilized more efficiently to facilitate conclusions and recommendations.17 to >15.0 ptsFairThe paper uses limited, incomplete, or inappropriate information as vague support for central ideas. Evidence is not cohesively connected to conclusions and recommendations.15 to >13.0 ptsPoorThe central argument is not supported or developed through evidence. The paper lacks detailed conclusions and recommendations.13 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.21 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.C.Information Literacythreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone – Student Performance: Strong development of central arguments through detailed examples and evidence of appropriate and resourceful academic research. Evidence is used to forward the argument and develop conclusions and recommendations.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone – Student Performance: Uses key examples from mostly reputable sources to develop a central argument. Evidence could be utilized more efficiently to facilitate conclusions and recommendations.2 ptsLimited: Capstone – Student Performance: Uses limited, incomplete, or inappropriate information as vague support for central ideas. Evidence is not cohesively connected to conclusions and recommendations.1 ptsPoor: Capstone – Student Performance: The central argument is not supported or developed through evidence. The paper lacks detailed conclusions and recommendations.and recommendations.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone – Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Technology Literacy (16 Points)16 to >14.0 ptsExcellentThe paper demonstrates a clear understanding of the technology studied and utilizes media and electronic resources to support arguments and sustain teamwork.14 to >12.0 ptsCompetentThe paper leverages some knowledge of contemporary technologies and media and electronic resources to support basic arguments.12 to >10.0 ptsFairThe paper demonstrates minimal knowledge of contemporary technologies and utilizes median and electronic resources superficially for minimal impact on the overall argument.10 to >8.0 ptsPoorThe paper lacks a clear knowledge of contemporary technologies and does not utilize median and electronic resources effectively.8 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.16 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.D.Technology Literacythreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone – Student Performance: Clear understanding of the technology studied and utilizes media and electronic resources to support arguments and sustain teamwork.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone – Student Performance: Leverages some knowledge of contemporary technologies and media and electronic resources to support basic arguments.2 ptsLimited: Capstone – Student Performance: Minimal knowledge of contemporary technologies and utilizes median and electronic resources superficially for minimal impact on the overall argument1 ptsPoor: The paper lacks a clear knowledge of contemporary technologies and does not utilize median and electronic resources effectively.0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Cultural Competence (21 Points)21 to >19.0 ptsExcellentThe paper demonstrates strong evidence of collaboration, encompasses diverse fields of knowledge, and illustrate create thought processes to address global problems.19 to >17.0 ptsCompetentThe paper demonstrates some evidence of collaboration, includes multiple fields of knowledge, and illustrates competence in problem solving.17 to >15.0 ptsFairThe paper demonstrates limited evidence of collaboration, includes few or limited fields of knowledge, and lacks creative problem solving.15 to >13.0 ptsPoorThe paper lacks clear evidence of collaboration, does not include multiple fields of knowledge as evidence, and lacks problem solving skills.13 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.21 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.E.Cultural Competencethreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone – Student Performance: Strong evidence of collaboration, encompasses diverse fields of knowledge, and illustrate create thought processes to address global problems.3 ptsComptent: Capstone – Student Performance: Some evidence of collaboration, includes multiple fields of knowledge, and illustrates competence in problem solving.2 ptsLimited: Capstone – Student Performance: Limited evidence of collaboration, includes few or limited fields of knowledge, and lacks creative problem solving.1 ptsPoor: Capstone – Student Performance: Lacks clear evidence of collaboration, does not include multiple fields of knowledge as evidence, and lacks problem solving skills.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone – Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFinal Paper: Global Awareness and Civic Engagement (26 Points)26 to >23.0 ptsExcellentThe paper demonstrates a clear sense of global awareness through concrete recommendations for action.23 to >20.0 ptsCompetentThe paper demonstrates some notions of global awareness and makes at least one recommendation for action.20 to >17.0 ptsFairThe paper demonstrates a vague sense of global awareness and does not include specific recommendations for action.17 to >14.0 ptsPoorThe paper lacks global awareness of contemporary issues and makes no recommendations for action.14 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper does not address this competency.26 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.LAS432.F.Global Awareness and Civic Engagementthreshold: 3.0 pts4 ptsExcellent: Capstone – Student Performance: Clear sense of global awareness through concrete recommendations for action.3 ptsCompetent: Capstone – Student Performance: Some notions of global awareness and makes at least one recommendation for action.2 ptsLimited: Capstone – Student Performance: Vague sense of global awareness and does not include specific recommendations for action.1 ptsPoor: Capstone – Student Performance: Lacks global awareness of contemporary issues and makes no recommendations for action.0 ptsUnacceptable: Capstone – Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.4 pts Total Points: 150